New Rules Make Many More Eligible for OT

The New Rule

The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), passed in 1938, guarantees a minimum wage to almost all employees in the United States, and requires employers to pay overtime when employees work more than 40 hours in any workweek. There are, however, several exemptions to the overtime requirements. Employees who are exempt from overtime requirements under federal law most often fall under one (or more) of five exemptions (the so-called “white collar” exemptions): executive, administrative, professional, computer employees, and outside sales.

Under the FLSA, in order to classify a position as exempt, generally that position must pass both a salary test and a duties test. Currently, the salary test requires a weekly salary of $455 per week (or $23,660 per year). The duties test depends upon the exemption, but typical duties to look for include: directing and supervising the work of others; the authority to hire, fire, and promote; non-manual work; exercising independent judgment and discretion; advanced knowledge in a field of science and learning through prolonged course of instruction; or sales performed away from the employer’s place of business.

Under the new rule, the salary test will more than double from $455 per week to $913 per week (or from $23,660 per year to $47,476 per year). There is no salary test for outside sales.

The new rule was announced in May by President Obama and Labor Secretary Perez. According to the Labor Department, “This long-awaited update will result in a meaningful boost to many workers’ wallets, and will go a long way toward realizing President Obama’s commitment to ensuring every worker is compensated fairly for their hard work.” The DOL also estimated that the initial change to the income threshold will make 4.2 million salaried workers newly eligible for overtime pay.

Challenges to the Rule

Several groups, including the U.S. House of Representatives, have sought to delay the scheduled December 1st implementation. On September 28th, Congress passed the Regulatory Relief for Small Businesses, Schools and Nonprofits Act by a vote of 246-177, mostly along party lines. Under the bill, the new overtime pay rules would be postponed until June 1, 2017. A similar bill has been introduced in the Senate, but its chances of passing are questionable. Even if the bill is passed, Obama has said he will veto it.

Two lawsuits have also been filed against the new rule. Twenty-one states—Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin—have filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas against the Labor Department, Secretary Perez, and other federal officials to stop the new overtime rules.

In a separate lawsuit filed in the same court, more than 50 business groups have banded together to try to stop the rule. The groups include the NRF, the National Federal of Independent Business, and the National Association of Manufacturers. According to the lawsuit, the Labor Department exceeded its statutory authority in issuing the regulation and violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

“The DOL went too far in the new overtime regulation,” said Randy Johnson, senior vice president of Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is part of one of the lawsuits, in a statement. “We have heard from our members, small businesses, nonprofits, and other employers that the salary threshold is going to result in significant new labor costs and cause many disruptions in how work gets done. Furthermore, the automatic escalator provision means that employers will have to go through their reclassification analysis every three years. In combination, the new overtime rule will result in salaried professional employees being converted to hourly wages, and it will reduce workplace flexibility, remote electronic access to work, and opportunities for career advancement.”

 

CONTINUE READING ONLINE AT:

http://cpapracticeadvisor.com/12275807

 

On Oct. 19, Judge Amos Mazzant of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted a request by the two groups of plaintiffs to combine their cases. Both lawsuits have now been consolidated, and the parties have filed motions asking the court to issue a preliminary injunction to prevent the rules from going into effect while the legality of the rule is fully litigated.

Next Steps

Most employers are hoping that the lawsuits will be successful. However, they should also prepare for new overtime regulations to begin on December 1st. Here are some of the steps companies need to take:

• Review Your Workforce Now and Gather Information

The rule change will require employers to take action. Now is the time for employers to conduct a thorough review of their workforces, in order to gather the information necessary to make informed decisions. This review should be more substantial than simply identifying what exempt employees currently make less than $47,476 per year. Considerations that should be examined include the number of hours potentially affected exempt employees currently work, potential salary compression issues, pay differences across regions or state lines, and the potential effect on incentive payments or similar bonus payments.

If employees are reclassified as non-exempt, they will be required to begin accurately keeping track of time worked. This will affect the employee’s ability to go above-and-beyond, perform outside of regular work hours, or put in the extra effort to secure additional training. The effect these changes will have upon a business should be thoroughly considered.

If your employees routinely perform work at home, including answering emails, this should be reviewed. Once an employee is reclassified as non-exempt, routine and minor work at home can constitute work time, and can expose your company to liability.

• Consider Workplace Morale When Making Decisions

Employers should be cognizant of workplace morale and its impact on productivity when deciding on any solution. Simply re-designating previously exempt employees as non-exempt can have significant negative effects. First, many employees will view this as a demotion, especially supervisors who have worked their way up from the crew. Second, previously exempt employees will likely lose work schedule flexibility, benefits that are provided only to exempt employees, and perhaps equally important to many, their status in the workplace.

• Consider Alternatives

Employers could also explore alternative methods to help limit the impact of the new regulations, such as the fluctuating work week schedule or moving employees to non-exempt salaried status. However, before making any changes, employers should ensure that they are complying with both state and federal law, which often have different requirements. And employers should remember that alternative arrangements, other than traditional non-exempt or exempt status, often lead to inadvertent violations of the FLSA.

• Provide Clear Communication

Whatever steps a company chooses to take to address the new rules, clear communication with affected employees will be paramount. Employees who are reclassified as non-exempt will require a clear explanation why, as well as an explanation of new requirements, such as keeping track of their time. In addition, some employees may need to be let go, some jobs may need to be restructured, and some duties may need to be absorbed across several jobs—all of these operational and other changes will need to be carefully explained.

The changes to overtime regulations will have a major impact on many organizations from a financial and management perspective. It will take close monitoring and proactive work to make sure employers stay in compliance.

———

 

Richard D. Alaniz is senior partner at Alaniz Schraeder Linker Farris Mayes, L.L.P., a national labor and employment firm based in Houston. He has been at the forefront of labor and employment law for over thirty years, including stints with the U.S. Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board. Rick is a prolific writer on labor and employment law and conducts frequent seminars to client companies and trade associations across the country. Questions about this article, or requests to subscribe to receive Rick’s monthly articles, can be addressed to Rick at (281) 833-2200 or ralaniz@alaniz-schraeder.com.