5 Reasons Why Your Financial Close Process Isn’t Working

Here are five reasons why your financial close process may be inefficient and some ways to get it back on track.  

Poor process design:

In companies of all sizes, financial information is likely gathered from different parts of the enterprise. In addition to the accounting group, separate functions—such as operations, finance, and HR–all contribute to the compilation of financial statements that provide key stakeholders with the data they need to make informed decisions. As a result, these teams must coordinate their activities to ensure data is consistently gathered and reported across different departments, geographies, and legal entities. Without this alignment, data integrity issues will arise that require careful manual review and finessing. For companies with robust, decentralized operations, system integration across the entire financial close cycle is key. 

Whether a company is using a system or manually reconciling its accounts, the financial close team must be adequately trained to adhere to the established processes. As part of the training and onboarding process, employees should be educated and reminded of the value of a robust close function and their important role within that process.   

Lack of prioritization:

When companies do not properly prioritize their close activities and adhere to deadlines, a domino effect occurs that delays the rest of the close activities that follow. Companies should develop a close calendar to prioritize activities, manage issues that arise, and track progress against deadlines. As part of developing the close calendar, companies should determine which tasks have a high degree of influence over subsequent activities and schedule them early in the close process (even before “Day 1”) to eliminate bottlenecks. Companies should establish realistic timelines that allow management to thoroughly review the financial packages, including reconciliations and consolidations; failure to do so will disrupt the review cadence, delay downstream activities, and put controls at risk when the team inevitably tries to “catch up” to meet deadlines. 

Inadequate control environment: 

Regardless of how many journal entries a company records each month, the review process will be slow if data is not adequately validated and analyzed and processes are not standardized across the organization. For large companies with multiple locations, disparate practices at each site may further delay the close process as different teams employ different methods. With different methodologies in place—many of them manual—the likelihood of errors increases, ultimately leading to further delays to research and resolve the issues. 

Companies should standardize the month-end close process across teams and locations and establish a consistent control environment with an emphasis on automation. Additionally, where manual entries are required, companies should establish clearly defined roles and responsibilities to ensure reviewers have appropriate underlying support, resulting in more timely, predictable and accurate financial information.

Worrying about the small stuff:

Accounting and finance functions often get caught up in minor, less impactful details, which can ground the process to a halt as individuals focus on immaterial matters that have little bearing on decision makers. Management should establish an appropriate materiality threshold for the close process and instruct accounting teams to pass on clearly immaterial items. 

One component of an effective financial close is to define which close activities are required for monthly, quarterly, or annual close processes. Often, monthly close activities can be truncated to deliver relevant results to the business when external reporting is not required. More robust closings may be required quarterly and annually for bank or regulatory reporting. Saving heavier lifts for closes that have an external impact allows the accounting group to keep up with operational needs and appropriately plan for labor-intensive closes. 

Too many manual activities:

Many companies still rely on manual inputs for their close process, leaving them exposed to errors and delays in the event key employees resign. Companies that maximize the use of automation with system-based solutions will speed up journal entries, calculations, and approvals while eliminating errors. For example, management can establish recurring entries for items such as debt premiums and discounts, certain reserves, prepaid amortization, and straight-line rents. Most importantly, focusing on automation frees employees at all levels of the organization from daily data entry and governance, empowering them to focus on the strategic initiatives that help accelerate growth. 

Of course, automation technology is not the salve for broken or inefficient processes. Concurrent with introducing system solutions, companies should ensure robust finance and accounting structures and proven processes are in place. 

The efficient delivery of quality month-end data gives management teams the information they need to understand the financial health of the business and make timely and informed decisions. By reviewing their existing processes and identifying areas for improvement, companies can increase the quality and accuracy of their financial reporting while decreasing the overall close time.

 =====

Ryan Kimbro is a director at Riveron.